注释（第7/14页）
[46] hobbes, On the Citizen, 82, 124 (“et bellum civile nascitur”), 149.
[47] Ibid., 15.
[48] 背景介绍，特别参见Kelsey, “Ordinance for the Trial of Charles I”; Kelsey,“Trial of Charles I”; Holmes, “Trial and Execution of Charles I”。
[49] Donagan, War in England, 1642—1649, 130.
[50] Orr, “Juristic Foundation of Regicide.”
[51] “An Act of the Commons of England Assembled in Parliament for Erecting a High Court of Justice, for the Trying and Judging of Charles Stuart, King of England” ( Jan. 6, 1649), in Acts and Ordinances of the Interregnum,1642—1660, ed. Firth and Rait, 1:1253 –54 (my emphasis). Heath, Chronicle of the Late Intestine War in the Three Kingdomes of England, Scotland, and Ireland, 194 – 95, and “The Act Erecting a High Court of Justice for the King’s Trial” ( Jan. 6, 1649), in Gardiner, Constitutional Documents of the Puritan Revolution, 1625—1660, 357, have “civil war” in place of “cruel War,” but this is not attested in, for example, “An Ordinance of the Commons in England in Parliament Assembled with a List of the Commissioners & Officers of the Said Court by Them Elected” ( Jan. 3, 1649), British Library E.536(35), fol. 1r, or in[ John Nalson], A True Copy of the Journal of the High Court of Justice, for the Tryal of K. Charles I, 2.
[52] Journals of the House of Commons, 6:107, 111, quoted in Orr, Treason and the State, 173.
[53] Bauman, Crimen Maiestatis in the Roman Republic and Augustan Principate,271–77; Orr, Treason and the State, 12, 44 – 45 (referring to 25 Edward III, st. 5,c. 3); Digest 48.4.3.
[54] hobbes, Leviathan, 2:192.
[55] Ibid., 2:256, 274, 278, 282.
[56] hobbes, “Questions Relative to Hereditary Right” (1679), in Writings on Common Law and Hereditary Right, 177– 78.
[57] Locke, Two Treatises of Government, 137 (“The Preface”).
[58] Woolhouse, Locke, 11.
[59] 例如Harrison and Laslett, Library of John Locke, items 2, 561– 62, 927,1146 – 48, 1818 –19, 2792b, 3060。
[60] Locke, Two Treatises of Government, 278 (2nd Treatise, § 16).
[61] Ibid., 416 –17 (2nd Treatise, §§ 227, 228).
[62] Locke, “On Allegiance and the Revolution” (ca. April 1690), in Political Essays, 307.
[63] Pocock, “Fourth English Civil War,” 153, 159.
[64] Sidney, Discourses Concerning Government, 198, 187– 89.
[65] Ibid., 193, 196 – 99.
[66] Sidney, Court Maxims, 20.
[67] Sidney, Discourses Concerning Government, 121.
[68] Ibid., 198.
[69] Filmer, Patriarcha, 54, 55–56, 57, 58.
[70] Sidney, Discourses Concerning Government, 120.
[71] Ibid., 172.
[72] Montesquieu, Reflections on the Causes of the Rise and Fall of the Roman Empire, 61; Bates, States of War, 160 – 64.
[73] Jouffroy, Mélanges philosophiques par Théodore Jouffroy, 140 (“Les guerresciviles de l’Europe sont finies”).
第四章 革命时代的内战 18世纪
[1] Abdul-Ahad, “ ‘Syria Is Not a Revolution Any More.’ ”
[2] Compare Viola, “Rivoluzione e guerra civile,” 24: “In un certo senso la rivoluzione sprovincializza la guerra civile.”
[3] Arendt, On Revolution, 12.
[4] 在Encyclopédie的“战争”这一词条中，同样没有提到Civil war［Guerre］。在Dictionnaire de l’Académie Française (1762)第四版中将Guerre civile,& guerre intestine定义为La guerre qui s’allume entre les peuples d’un mêmeÉtat。参见the ARTFL Project’s“Dictionnaires d’autrefois”。http://artflproject.uchicago.edu /content/dictionnaires-dautrefois.
[5] Koselleck, “Historical Criteria of the Modern Concept of Revolution,” trans.Tribe, 47, 48, 49。revolution和civil war两个概念的连续性，参见Koselleck,Critique and Crisis, 160 – 61; Bulst et al., “Revolution, Rebellion, Aufruhr,Bürgerkrieg,” esp. 712 –14, 726 –27, 778 – 80。
[6] Momigliano, “Ancient History and the Antiquarian,” 294; Goulemot, Le règne de l’histoire, 127–56.
[7] Echard, The Roman History from the Building of the City to the Perfect Settlement of the Empire by Augustus Cæsar.
[8] Vertot, Histoire de la conjuration de Portugal; Vertot, Histoire des révolutions de Suède où l’on voit les changemens qui sont arrivez; Vertot, Histoire des révolutions de Portugal.
[9] Trakulhun, “Das Ende der Ming-Dynastie in China (1644).”
[10] Sidney, Discourses Concerning Government, 195 – 96.